Compare Any software

Find the perfect software for your team

Add software
Compare up to 3 Products
Remove from comparisonProcurement & Source-to-Pay Transformation Services

Procurement & Source-to-Pay Transformation Services

szsdsadad asass kjkjkj dssadsad
StarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStar3.3(1)
Starting at
#20
Remove from comparisonProactis CLM

Proactis CLM

Proactis CLM is a cloud-native contract lifecycle management platform designed to streamline contract creation, negotiation, execution, and management across the enterprise. The product provides templates, e-signature integration, automated workflows, obligation tracking, and central contract repository capabilities to reduce cycle time and improve compliance. It targets mid-market and large enterprises seeking to digitize and standardize contract processes beyond traditional document storage. Proactis CLM emphasizes user-friendly workflow automation, pre-built integration with major procurement and ERP systems, and out-of-the-box functionality that enables quick deployment. The platform is part of the broader Proactis procurement suite and competes with Iconiqa, Ironclad, and other modern CLM vendors in the mid-to-enterprise segment.
Starting at
Free
Overall Score & Breakdown

Procurement & Source-to-Pay Transformation Services

Established
69/ 100
0100
039 Emerging4059 Capable6074 Established7589 Advanced90100 Best-in-class

Score breakdown by pillar

Functional Coverage
42
Market Validation
86
Buyer Sentiment
66
Deployment & TCO
69
Profile Completeness
81

Proactis CLM

Established
61/ 100
0100
039 Emerging4059 Capable6074 Established7589 Advanced90100 Best-in-class

Score breakdown by pillar

Functional Coverage
75
Market Validation
70
Deployment & TCO
70
Profile Completeness
90
Categories
Pros & Cons

Procurement & Source-to-Pay Transformation Services

Top Pros

correctUsers love the ease of use in Notion, seamlessly organizing documents and gaining creative insights effortlessly.
correctExcellent user experience
correctFast implementation

Top Cons

crossUsers find the learning curve challenging.
crossAdvanced procurement features limited
crossghjgh

Proactis CLM

Top Pros

correctUser-friendly interface and out-of-the-box setup
correctStrong ERP and procurement platform integrations
correctComprehensive obligation and renewal tracking
correctFlexible cloud and on-premise deployment options
correctStreamlined e-signature and workflow automation

Top Cons

crossCan require customization for highly complex contract languages
crossSmaller user community compared to legacy CLM incumbents
crossLimited advanced AI-driven contract analysis in early versions
Company Size Fit

Procurement & Source-to-Pay Transformation Services

Startup
Low
Small Enterprise
Low
Mid-Market
Medium
Large Enterprise
High

Proactis CLM

Startup
Low
Small Enterprise
Medium
Mid-Market
High
Large Enterprise
High
Buyer Profile

Procurement & Source-to-Pay Transformation Services

Procurement Maturity

L1L2L3L4L5

sdasdad

Industries

Hospitality & Travel

jjfk knsdklds

Organization Type

asdas

Proactis CLM

Procurement Maturity

L1L2L3L4L5

Suitable for organizations at all maturity levels; highly valuable for L4–L5 enterprises managing complex, multi-party contracts at scale.

Industries

ManufacturingProfessional Services / ConsultingEnergy & UtilitiesRetail & eCommerceHealthcareGovernment & Public Sector

Strong traction in regulated and complex-procurement sectors where contract compliance and supplier management are critical.

Organization Type

Mid-Market, Large Enterprise

Pricing & Deployment

Procurement & Source-to-Pay Transformation Services

Pricing Model

ksndfklns, lsndfkls, sdkfnol

Free Trial

Yes

Typical Cost Range

dfdsf

zdcszd

User Tiers

qwqwqw, opoo

Contract Length Options

dsdfsf, kl ooooo

Bundling Options

jnkln, eiwrpowi

Deployment Model

dfgdfg, mnmnmn

Deployment Duration

433

sdf

Proactis CLM

Pricing Model

Per User, Per Module

Free Trial

Yes

Typical Cost Range

$50K–$250K/yr

Annual cost depends on user count, modules selected, and contract volume; enterprises typically invest $100K–$250K annually.

User Tiers

Per Named User, Concurrent User, Read-Only Viewer

Contract Length Options

Annual, Multi-Year, Month-to-Month

Bundling Options

Contract Management Bundle, Procurement Suite Integration, Enterprise Contract Suite

Deployment Model

Cloud, On-Premise

Deployment Duration

3–6 months

depends on ERP complexity and global invoicing scope

Plans

Procurement & Source-to-Pay Transformation Services

aqwqw

#20

1212313

  • 12313
  • 123131
  • 12313

Proactis CLM

Professional

Free

Per user / month

  • Template management and authoring
  • E-signature integration
  • Basic contract analytics

Enterprise

Free

Custom quote

  • Advanced workflow automation
  • Full contract lifecycle tracking
  • Supplier portal and collaboration
  • AI-powered contract analysis
  • Custom integrations and APIs
Ratings & Reviews

Procurement & Source-to-Pay Transformation Services

3.3out of 5Average
StarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStar

Based on 1 review

View reviews →

Highlights

How well does the provider identify actionable savings opportunities beyond surface-level findings? 5.0
How clear and actionable are the provider's deliverables and executive presentations? 4.0
How well does the provider support knowledge transfer to build internal analytics capability? 4.0

Opportunities

How effectively does the provider refresh and maintain spend analytics on an ongoing basis? 2.0
Has the service supported better category strategy decisions with data-backed insights? 2.0
How effectively does the provider classify and enrich your spend data? 2.0

Proactis CLM

No reviews yet.

How effectively does the provider classify and enrich your spend data? Best
2.0 / 5
How effectively does the provider classify and enrich your spend data?
How robust is the provider's analytics methodology and industry benchmarking data? Best
3.0 / 5
How robust is the provider's analytics methodology and industry benchmarking data?
How well does the provider identify actionable savings opportunities beyond surface-level findings? Best
5.0 / 5
How well does the provider identify actionable savings opportunities beyond surface-level findings?
How effectively does the provider handle data integration across multiple source systems? Best
3.0 / 5
How effectively does the provider handle data integration across multiple source systems?
How strong is the provider's capability to deliver predictive and prescriptive analytics? Best
3.0 / 5
How strong is the provider's capability to deliver predictive and prescriptive analytics?
Has the provider's analysis led to measurable realized savings or cost avoidance? Best
3.0 / 5
Has the provider's analysis led to measurable realized savings or cost avoidance?
How effectively has the service improved spend visibility and addressable spend coverage? Best
3.0 / 5
How effectively has the service improved spend visibility and addressable spend coverage?
Has the service supported better category strategy decisions with data-backed insights? Best
2.0 / 5
Has the service supported better category strategy decisions with data-backed insights?
How clear and actionable are the provider's deliverables and executive presentations? Best
4.0 / 5
How clear and actionable are the provider's deliverables and executive presentations?
How well does the provider support knowledge transfer to build internal analytics capability? Best
4.0 / 5
How well does the provider support knowledge transfer to build internal analytics capability?
How effectively does the provider refresh and maintain spend analytics on an ongoing basis? Best
2.0 / 5
How effectively does the provider refresh and maintain spend analytics on an ongoing basis?
How effectively does the provider manage the outsourced procurement processes end-to-end? Best
3.0 / 5
How effectively does the provider manage the outsourced procurement processes end-to-end?
How well does the provider's team integrate with your internal procurement organization? Best
3.0 / 5
How well does the provider's team integrate with your internal procurement organization?
How robust are the provider's technology tools and digital capabilities supporting the service? Best
3.0 / 5
How robust are the provider's technology tools and digital capabilities supporting the service?
How effectively does the provider handle change management and process improvement? Best
3.0 / 5
How effectively does the provider handle change management and process improvement?
How strong is the provider's category expertise and market knowledge in your key spend areas? Best
3.0 / 5
How strong is the provider's category expertise and market knowledge in your key spend areas?
Has the provider delivered measurable cost savings and procurement efficiency improvements? Best
4.0 / 5
Has the provider delivered measurable cost savings and procurement efficiency improvements?
How effectively has the engagement freed your internal team to focus on strategic activities? Best
4.0 / 5
How effectively has the engagement freed your internal team to focus on strategic activities?
Has the provider met or exceeded contracted SLAs and KPIs consistently? Best
4.0 / 5
Has the provider met or exceeded contracted SLAs and KPIs consistently?
How responsive and proactive is the provider's account management and governance? Best
4.0 / 5
How responsive and proactive is the provider's account management and governance?
How well does the provider handle knowledge transfer and institutional learning? Best
4.0 / 5
How well does the provider handle knowledge transfer and institutional learning?
How effectively does the provider scale resources up/down based on demand? Best
4.0 / 5
How effectively does the provider scale resources up/down based on demand?
Integration & Compatibility

Procurement & Source-to-Pay Transformation Services

Typical Integration Time

aghsdvhjads jabsvdhjas

Integration Cost Range

Integration Cost Range

Prebuilt Connectors

Prebuilt Connectors

ERP Compatibility

ERP Compatibility

Third-Party API Support

Third-party & API Support

Supplier Network Integration

Supplier Network Integration

Proactis CLM

Typical Integration Time

4-8 weeks

Integration Cost Range

$10K–$50K

Prebuilt Connectors

Salesforce, DocuSign, Coupa, SAP Ariba, Workday, ServiceNow

ERP Compatibility

SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, Workday, Microsoft Dynamics

Third-Party API Support

REST APIs, Webhooks, SOAP

Supplier Network Integration

Ariba Network, Coupa, SAP Supplier Network

Global & Regional

Procurement & Source-to-Pay Transformation Services

Regions Served

North AmericaMiddle East & AfricaLatin America

Languages & Local Support

EnglishFrenchArabicHindiKoreanJapanese

Data Residency & Compliance

GDPRSOC 2ISO 27001EUAPACBrazilSouth AfricaGlobalJapan

Regulatory & Tax Compliance

VATGSTMulti-Currencye-Invoicing Compliance (Global)GST Compliance (IndiaAPAC)IFRS / GAAP Reporting SupportData Privacy & Protection RegulationsSOX Compliance (Sarbanes-Oxley)GST Compliance (IndiaAPAC)

Public Sector Availability

AVAIBLE

Proactis CLM

Regions Served

North AmericaEuropeAsia Pacific

Languages & Local Support

EnglishGermanFrenchSpanish

Data Residency & Compliance

SOC 2GDPRRegional residency available

Regulatory & Tax Compliance

GDPRHIPAA-ready configurationSOX compliance

Public Sector Availability

Limited

Company & Market

Procurement & Source-to-Pay Transformation Services

Customer Base

jdbjkdsf, sdioruew, mcjwapei

Revenue Band

tweiuyri, dlfkjkldf

Awards & Recognition

qoqpqo, hgdfj, fgjkbes

Proactis CLM

Customer Base

Mid-market and large enterprises across manufacturing, financial services, energy, and professional services; established in UK and EU markets with growing North American presence.

Awards & Recognition

Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader for Contract Management, named by Forrester as a strong performer in CLM

Tags

Procurement & Source-to-Pay Transformation Services

AIAI Contract ReviewAI ProcurementAI Classification

Proactis CLM

Workflow AutomationContract Lifecycle ManagementE-SignatureContract RepositoryContract ManagementSupplier ManagementObligation TrackingCompliance
Alternatives (3)
ContractPodAi (LEAH)

ContractPodAi (LEAH)

By ContractPodAi (LEAH)

Rosslyn Spend Analytics

Rosslyn Spend Analytics

By Rosslyn Analytics

Vendor & Partner Program

Get your software or service in front of the right buyers.

ProcureScore helps procurement teams discover, compare, and evaluate tools using verified reviews and maturity-fit scores.