Compare Any software

Name: Airbase AP Automation
Brand: Omnea
Rating: 2.7 (3 reviews)

Find the perfect software for your team

Add software

Compare up to 3 Products

Conga (CLM)

Conga CLM is a cloud-based contract lifecycle management solution that enables organizations to create, negotiate, execute, and manage contracts across the entire revenue lifecycle. It combines contract authoring, clause management, workflow automation, and AI-powered data extraction within a centralized repository. The platform is tightly integrated with CRM, ERP, and CPQ systems—especially Salesforce—making it ideal for organizations looking to align contracts with revenue operations and sales processes.

Starting at

Pricing not available

aaaaaaaaa

asdasdads

2.7(1)

Starting at

$20

Airbase AP Automation

Omnea is a procurement orchestration platform that unifies intake, vendor management, purchase requisitions, approvals, and AP automation in a single workflow. The "Airbase AP Automation" listing reflects Omnea's AP module (Omnea acquired or positions adjacent to the Airbase intake/AP heritage in some markets), covering invoice capture via email and PDF, AI-based header and line-item extraction, two- and three-way PO matching, exception handling, multi-level approval routing, and payment scheduling. It is designed for mid-market and high-growth enterprises that want a modern, finance-friendly P2P experience tightly integrated with ERPs like NetSuite, Sage Intacct, and Oracle. Differentiators include a strong intake-to-pay workflow, conversational Slack/Teams approvals, and rapid configurability without heavy IT. Omnea is used by fast-scaling technology and services companies across the UK, EU, and North America.

2.7(3)

Starting at

$34

Overall Score & Breakdown

Conga (CLM)

Score not available yet

aaaaaaaaa

Capable

46/ 100

0100

0–39 Emerging40–59 Capable60–74 Established75–89 Advanced90–100 Best-in-class

Score breakdown by pillar

Functional Coverage

Market Validation

Buyer Sentiment

Deployment & TCO

Profile Completeness

Airbase AP Automation

Established

63/ 100

0100

0–39 Emerging40–59 Capable60–74 Established75–89 Advanced90–100 Best-in-class

Score breakdown by pillar

Functional Coverage

Market Validation

Buyer Sentiment

Deployment & TCO

Profile Completeness

Pros & Cons

Conga (CLM)

Top Pros

Strong salesforce integration – best-in-class for Salesforce-native environments

Revenue lifecycle alignment – connects CPQ, contracts, and billing

Fast deployment – quicker implementation vs heavy CLM tools

Strong automation & templates – reduces manual contract creation

Good AI extraction capabilities – automates contract data capture

Top Cons

UI can be complex – not as intuitive as newer SaaS CLM tools

Performance issues reported – stability can vary in complex setups

Customization dependency – often requires Salesforce expertise

Limited supplier network – not procurement-centric

Support variability – mixed feedback from enterprise users

aaaaaaaaa

Top Pros

sdsad

asdasd

Top Cons

asdasd

Advanced procurement features limited

Airbase AP Automation

Top Pros

Modern, intuitive UI with strong intake-to-pay orchestration

Native Slack and Microsoft Teams approvals reduce cycle time

AI-based invoice capture with line-item extraction

Fast deployment compared to legacy P2P suites

Tight integrations with NetSuite, Sage Intacct, and modern ERPs

Top Cons

Limited depth for complex manufacturing or three-way matching at scale

Smaller supplier network than Coupa/Ariba

E-invoicing network coverage less mature for global compliance regimes

Less suited to very large enterprises with heavy customisation needs

Public-sector and regulated-industry references are limited

Company Size Fit

Conga (CLM)

StartupN/A

Small EnterpriseN/A

Mid-Market

High

Large EnterpriseN/A

aaaaaaaaa

Startup

Medium

Small Enterprise

High

Mid-Market

Low

Large Enterprise

Medium

Airbase AP Automation

Startup

Medium

Small Enterprise

High

Mid-Market

High

Large Enterprise

Low

Buyer Profile

Conga (CLM)

Industries

Manufacturing

Organization Type

Private company – revenue lifecycle and CLM platform provider

aaaaaaaaa

Procurement Maturity

L1L2L3L4L5

Best suited for mid-to-large enterprises at Level 3–4 maturity

Industries

ManufacturingHealthcare

asa sdsdsd

Organization Type

Private & Public Companies

Airbase AP Automation

Procurement Maturity

L1L2L3L4L5

Best suited to growing finance and procurement teams formalising P2P processes, rather than highly mature enterprise procurement organisations.

Industries

Information TechnologyProfessional Services / ConsultingMedia & EntertainmentRetail & eCommerce

Strongest traction in SaaS, technology, and professional-services companies with modern finance stacks.

Organization Type

Private Sector, High-Growth, Mid-Market

Pricing & Deployment

Conga (CLM)

Pricing Model

Subscription-based

Free Trial

Typical Cost Range

Medium

Bundling Options

Bundled with CPQ / Revenue Cloud

Deployment Model

Pros Strong Salesforce Integration – Best-in-class for Salesforce-native environments Revenue Lifecycle Alignment – Connects CPQ, contracts, and billing Fast Deployment – Quicker implementation vs heavy CLM tools Strong Automation & Templates – Reduces manual contract creation Good AI Extraction Capabilities – Automates contract data capture Cons UI Can Be Complex – Not as intuitive as newer SaaS CLM tools Performance Issues Reported – Stability can vary in complex setups Customization Dependency – Often requires Salesforce expertise Limited Supplier Network – Not procurement-centric Support Variability – Mixed feedback from enterprise users

Deployment Duration

2–5 months

aaaaaaaaa

Pricing Model

Project-based, Retainer, Managed Services Subscription

Free Trial

Yes

Typical Cost Range

Mid-to-high enterprise pricing tier depending on modules, users, and scope - starts from ~$200,000

fhf nvnv

User Tiers

qwqwqw, opoo

Contract Length Options

dsdfsf, kl ooooo

Bundling Options

Modular or full source-to-pay suite bundling available

Deployment Model

2024

Deployment Duration

12–24 weeks (mid-market); 6–12 months (large enterprise global deployments)

sdsds

Airbase AP Automation

Pricing Model

Subscription, Quote-Based, Per Module

Free Trial

Yes

Typical Cost Range

$25K–$150K/yr

Subscription pricing scales with modules, entities, and transaction volume; exact pricing is quote-based.

User Tiers

Requester, Approver, AP Specialist, Admin, Read-Only

Contract Length Options

Annual, Multi-Year

Bundling Options

Procure-to-Pay Suite, Standalone AP, Intake + PO, Full Source-to-Pay

Deployment Model

Cloud, SaaS, Multi-Tenant

Deployment Duration

4–12 weeks

sdfsdad

Plans

Conga (CLM)

No plans listed

aaaaaaaaa

Starter

$20

per month

✓Approval Time: 7 Days
✓AI Writer Matching

Airbase AP Automation

sdfasd

$34

234

Ratings & Reviews

Conga (CLM)

No reviews yet.

aaaaaaaaa

2.7out of 5Average

Based on 1 review

View reviews →

Highlights

How effectively does the platform handle invoice capture, OCR/AI extraction, and data validation? 5.0

How well does it support multi-format invoice ingestion (PDF, EDI, XML, email)? 5.0

How easy is it for AP staff to manage exceptions and resolve discrepancies? 4.0

Opportunities

How effectively does the provider transfer market knowledge and negotiation insights to your team? 1.0

How well does the provider support knowledge transfer to build internal analytics capability? 2.0

How clear and actionable are the provider's deliverables and executive presentations? 2.0

Airbase AP Automation

2.7out of 5Average

Based on 3 reviews

View reviews →

Highlights

How well does it support multi-format invoice ingestion (PDF, EDI, XML, email)? 3.7

How effective are the payment scheduling, early payment discount, and dynamic discounting features? 3.7

How effectively does the platform handle invoice capture, OCR/AI extraction, and data validation? 3.0

Opportunities

How much has the platform reduced invoice processing cost per invoice? 2.0

How effectively does the platform provide real-time visibility into payment status and liabilities? 2.3

How easy is it for AP staff to manage exceptions and resolve discrepancies? 2.3

How effectively does the platform handle invoice capture, OCR/AI extraction, and data validation?

—

How effectively does the platform handle invoice capture, OCR/AI extraction, and data validation? Best

5.0 / 5

How effectively does the platform handle invoice capture, OCR/AI extraction, and data validation?

3.0 / 5

How robust is the automated 2-way/3-way matching and exception routing?

—

How robust is the automated 2-way/3-way matching and exception routing?

2.0 / 5

How robust is the automated 2-way/3-way matching and exception routing? Best

2.7 / 5

How well does it support multi-format invoice ingestion (PDF, EDI, XML, email)?

—

How well does it support multi-format invoice ingestion (PDF, EDI, XML, email)? Best

5.0 / 5

How well does it support multi-format invoice ingestion (PDF, EDI, XML, email)?

3.7 / 5

How seamlessly does it integrate with your ERP accounts payable module?

—

How seamlessly does it integrate with your ERP accounts payable module? Best

3.0 / 5

How seamlessly does it integrate with your ERP accounts payable module?

2.3 / 5

How effective are the payment scheduling, early payment discount, and dynamic discounting features?

—

How effective are the payment scheduling, early payment discount, and dynamic discounting features?

3.0 / 5

How effective are the payment scheduling, early payment discount, and dynamic discounting features? Best

3.7 / 5

How much has the platform reduced invoice processing cost per invoice?

—

How much has the platform reduced invoice processing cost per invoice? Best

3.0 / 5

How much has the platform reduced invoice processing cost per invoice?

2.0 / 5

Has it measurably reduced days payable outstanding (DPO) or improved on-time payment rates?

—

Has it measurably reduced days payable outstanding (DPO) or improved on-time payment rates?

2.0 / 5

Has it measurably reduced days payable outstanding (DPO) or improved on-time payment rates? Best

2.7 / 5

How much manual intervention has been eliminated from the invoice-to-payment cycle?

—

How much manual intervention has been eliminated from the invoice-to-payment cycle? Best

3.0 / 5

How much manual intervention has been eliminated from the invoice-to-payment cycle?

2.3 / 5

How easy is it for AP staff to manage exceptions and resolve discrepancies?

—

How easy is it for AP staff to manage exceptions and resolve discrepancies? Best

4.0 / 5

How easy is it for AP staff to manage exceptions and resolve discrepancies?

2.3 / 5

How effectively does the platform provide real-time visibility into payment status and liabilities?

—

How effectively does the platform provide real-time visibility into payment status and liabilities?

2.0 / 5

How effectively does the platform provide real-time visibility into payment status and liabilities? Best

2.3 / 5

How well does it handle multi-entity, multi-currency, and cross-border payment scenarios?

—

How well does it handle multi-entity, multi-currency, and cross-border payment scenarios? Best

4.0 / 5

How well does it handle multi-entity, multi-currency, and cross-border payment scenarios?

3.0 / 5

How effectively does the provider execute strategic sourcing events for complex categories?

—

How effectively does the provider execute strategic sourcing events for complex categories? Best

3.0 / 5

How effectively does the provider execute strategic sourcing events for complex categories?

—

How strong is the provider's category expertise and supplier market intelligence?

—

How strong is the provider's category expertise and supplier market intelligence? Best

2.0 / 5

How strong is the provider's category expertise and supplier market intelligence?

—

How well does the provider manage the end-to-end sourcing process (strategy through award)?

—

How well does the provider manage the end-to-end sourcing process (strategy through award)? Best

3.0 / 5

How well does the provider manage the end-to-end sourcing process (strategy through award)?

—

How effectively does the provider conduct supplier negotiations on your behalf?

—

How effectively does the provider conduct supplier negotiations on your behalf? Best

2.0 / 5

How effectively does the provider conduct supplier negotiations on your behalf?

—

How robust are the provider's analytical tools and should-cost modeling capabilities?

—

How robust are the provider's analytical tools and should-cost modeling capabilities? Best

2.0 / 5

How robust are the provider's analytical tools and should-cost modeling capabilities?

—

Has the provider delivered measurable savings above what your team could achieve internally?

—

Has the provider delivered measurable savings above what your team could achieve internally? Best

2.0 / 5

Has the provider delivered measurable savings above what your team could achieve internally?

—

How effectively has the engagement improved supplier quality, terms, or service levels?

—

How effectively has the engagement improved supplier quality, terms, or service levels? Best

3.0 / 5

How effectively has the engagement improved supplier quality, terms, or service levels?

—

Has the provider helped capture savings in categories you previously considered non-addressable?

—

Has the provider helped capture savings in categories you previously considered non-addressable? Best

2.0 / 5

Has the provider helped capture savings in categories you previously considered non-addressable?

—

How well does the provider collaborate with your internal category managers and stakeholders?

—

How well does the provider collaborate with your internal category managers and stakeholders? Best

3.0 / 5

How well does the provider collaborate with your internal category managers and stakeholders?

—

How effectively does the provider transfer market knowledge and negotiation insights to your team?

—

How effectively does the provider transfer market knowledge and negotiation insights to your team? Best

1.0 / 5

How effectively does the provider transfer market knowledge and negotiation insights to your team?

—

How strong is the quality of the provider's sourcing recommendations and supplier shortlists?

—

How strong is the quality of the provider's sourcing recommendations and supplier shortlists? Best

3.0 / 5

How strong is the quality of the provider's sourcing recommendations and supplier shortlists?

—

How effectively does the platform identify, certify, and track diverse suppliers?

—

How effectively does the platform identify, certify, and track diverse suppliers? Best

4.0 / 5

How effectively does the platform identify, certify, and track diverse suppliers?

—

How well does it support diversity spend tracking and goal-setting by category, region, and tier?

—

How well does it support diversity spend tracking and goal-setting by category, region, and tier? Best

2.0 / 5

How well does it support diversity spend tracking and goal-setting by category, region, and tier?

—

How robust are the diverse supplier discovery and matchmaking capabilities?

—

How robust are the diverse supplier discovery and matchmaking capabilities? Best

2.0 / 5

How robust are the diverse supplier discovery and matchmaking capabilities?

—

How effectively does it handle Tier 2 subcontracting diversity reporting?

—

How effectively does it handle Tier 2 subcontracting diversity reporting? Best

2.0 / 5

How effectively does it handle Tier 2 subcontracting diversity reporting?

—

How well does it integrate with sourcing workflows to embed diversity into sourcing decisions?

—

How well does it integrate with sourcing workflows to embed diversity into sourcing decisions? Best

3.0 / 5

How well does it integrate with sourcing workflows to embed diversity into sourcing decisions?

—

Has the platform helped you measurably increase diverse supplier spend as a percentage of total?

—

Has the platform helped you measurably increase diverse supplier spend as a percentage of total? Best

2.0 / 5

Has the platform helped you measurably increase diverse supplier spend as a percentage of total?

—

How effectively has it supported compliance with regulatory or client diversity requirements?

—

How effectively has it supported compliance with regulatory or client diversity requirements? Best

3.0 / 5

How effectively has it supported compliance with regulatory or client diversity requirements?

—

Has it broadened the pipeline of qualified diverse suppliers for strategic categories?

—

Has it broadened the pipeline of qualified diverse suppliers for strategic categories? Best

3.0 / 5

Has it broadened the pipeline of qualified diverse suppliers for strategic categories?

—

How intuitive is the reporting and stakeholder dashboard for diversity program leaders?

—

How intuitive is the reporting and stakeholder dashboard for diversity program leaders? Best

2.0 / 5

How intuitive is the reporting and stakeholder dashboard for diversity program leaders?

—

How easy is it for diverse suppliers to self-register and maintain their certifications?

—

How easy is it for diverse suppliers to self-register and maintain their certifications? Best

3.0 / 5

How easy is it for diverse suppliers to self-register and maintain their certifications?

—

How effectively does the platform support storytelling and ROI reporting for diversity programs?

—

How effectively does the platform support storytelling and ROI reporting for diversity programs? Best

3.0 / 5

How effectively does the platform support storytelling and ROI reporting for diversity programs?

—

How effectively does the provider classify and enrich your spend data?

—

How effectively does the provider classify and enrich your spend data? Best

3.0 / 5

How effectively does the provider classify and enrich your spend data?

—

How robust is the provider's analytics methodology and industry benchmarking data?

—

How robust is the provider's analytics methodology and industry benchmarking data? Best

2.0 / 5

How robust is the provider's analytics methodology and industry benchmarking data?

—

How well does the provider identify actionable savings opportunities beyond surface-level findings?

—

How well does the provider identify actionable savings opportunities beyond surface-level findings? Best

3.0 / 5

How well does the provider identify actionable savings opportunities beyond surface-level findings?

—

How effectively does the provider handle data integration across multiple source systems?

—

How effectively does the provider handle data integration across multiple source systems? Best

3.0 / 5

How effectively does the provider handle data integration across multiple source systems?

—

How strong is the provider's capability to deliver predictive and prescriptive analytics?

—

How strong is the provider's capability to deliver predictive and prescriptive analytics? Best

3.0 / 5

How strong is the provider's capability to deliver predictive and prescriptive analytics?

—

Has the provider's analysis led to measurable realized savings or cost avoidance?

—

Has the provider's analysis led to measurable realized savings or cost avoidance? Best

2.0 / 5

Has the provider's analysis led to measurable realized savings or cost avoidance?

—

How effectively has the service improved spend visibility and addressable spend coverage?

—

How effectively has the service improved spend visibility and addressable spend coverage? Best

2.0 / 5

How effectively has the service improved spend visibility and addressable spend coverage?

—

Has the service supported better category strategy decisions with data-backed insights?

—

Has the service supported better category strategy decisions with data-backed insights? Best

2.0 / 5

Has the service supported better category strategy decisions with data-backed insights?

—

How clear and actionable are the provider's deliverables and executive presentations?

—

How clear and actionable are the provider's deliverables and executive presentations? Best

2.0 / 5

How clear and actionable are the provider's deliverables and executive presentations?

—

How well does the provider support knowledge transfer to build internal analytics capability?

—

How well does the provider support knowledge transfer to build internal analytics capability? Best

2.0 / 5

How well does the provider support knowledge transfer to build internal analytics capability?

—

How effectively does the provider refresh and maintain spend analytics on an ongoing basis?

—

How effectively does the provider refresh and maintain spend analytics on an ongoing basis? Best

3.0 / 5

How effectively does the provider refresh and maintain spend analytics on an ongoing basis?

—

Integration & Compatibility

Conga (CLM)

Typical Integration Time

1–3 months

Integration Cost Range

Medium

Prebuilt Connectors

Yes

ERP Compatibility

Strong

Third-Party API Support

Strong APIs

Supplier Network Integration

Limited

aaaaaaaaa

Typical Integration Time

Integration Cost Range

Prebuilt Connectors

Prebuilt connectors available

ERP Compatibility

ERP Compatibility (SAP, Oracle, Dynamics)

Third-Party API Support

Third-party & API Support

Supplier Network Integration

Airbase AP Automation

Typical Integration Time

2–6 weeks

Integration Cost Range

Included

Prebuilt Connectors

NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Xero, QuickBooks, Slack, Microsoft Teams, DocuSign, Workday, BambooHR, Okta

ERP Compatibility

NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Xero, QuickBooks, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle

Third-Party API Support

REST APIs, Webhooks, SSO SAML, SCIM, ERP integrations, HRIS integrations

Supplier Network Integration

Supplier Portal, Email Onboarding, Bank Verification

Global & Regional

Conga (CLM)

Regions Served

Global

Languages & Local Support

Multi-language support

Data Residency & Compliance

GDPRSOC compliant

Regulatory & Tax Compliance

Strong

Public Sector Availability

Moderate

aaaaaaaaa

Languages & Local Support

FrenchGermanSpanish

Data Residency & Compliance

sesadasdaEUUKAustralia

Regulatory & Tax Compliance

sdasdPEPPOL Network ComplianceSales Tax Compliance (US)VAT Compliance (EUUK)VAT Compliance (EUUK)

Public Sector Availability

varies by country

Airbase AP Automation

Regions Served

EuropeNorth America

Languages & Local Support

EnglishFrenchGermanSpanish

Data Residency & Compliance

EUUS residency

Regulatory & Tax Compliance

VATGSTSales Tax

Public Sector Availability

Limited

Differentiators

Conga (CLM)

—

aaaaaaaaa

AI & Touchless Processing Capability

kbjkbjkb

Invoice Capture Intelligence

kbklbklb

Workflow Flexibility

klbklbklb

ERP Integration Depth

klbklbklbklb

Supplier Experience & Portal

klbklbklbkl

Global Compliance & Tax Support

bklbkbklb

Exception Handling Capability

lbklbklb

Analytics & AP Insights

blbklbk

Scalability & Performance

bklblbklbk

Autonomous AP / AI Agent Readiness

bkb

Airbase AP Automation

AI & Touchless Processing Capability

kjbnjkbnjkl

Invoice Capture Intelligence

lknklnklnkl

Workflow Flexibility

nklnklnkln

ERP Integration Depth

lblb

Supplier Experience & Portal

lbklbklblbl

Global Compliance & Tax Support

bklblbklbl

Exception Handling Capability

bklbklbklb

Analytics & AP Insights

lbklbklbklb

Scalability & Performance

lbklbklblb

Autonomous AP / AI Agent Readiness

ouhio

Company & Market

Conga (CLM)

Customer Base

10,000+ customers across Conga platform

Awards & Recognition

Gartner recognition; Forrester presence; Salesforce ecosystem leader; CPQ-CLM convergence strength

aaaaaaaaa

Customer Base

Global enterprises including Fortune 500 companies across industries, large plasy into mid-market and public enterprise as well

Revenue Band

lklklk kmm upppppp

Awards & Recognition

Awards and Recognition

Airbase AP Automation

Customer Base

High-growth technology, SaaS, fintech, and professional-services companies primarily across the UK, EU, and North America.

Awards & Recognition

ewfeafs

Conga (CLM)

No tags

aaaaaaaaa

Airbase AP Automation

Intake ManagementVendor ManagementApproval WorkflowsProcure-to-PayAP AutomationInvoice ProcessingSpend ControlInvoice Matching

Compare Any software

Conga (CLM)

aaaaaaaaa

Airbase AP Automation

Conga (CLM)

aaaaaaaaa

Airbase AP Automation

Conga (CLM)

aaaaaaaaa

Airbase AP Automation

Conga (CLM)

aaaaaaaaa

Airbase AP Automation

Conga (CLM)

aaaaaaaaa

Airbase AP Automation

Conga (CLM)

aaaaaaaaa

Airbase AP Automation

Conga (CLM)

aaaaaaaaa

Airbase AP Automation

Conga (CLM)

aaaaaaaaa

Airbase AP Automation

Conga (CLM)

aaaaaaaaa

Airbase AP Automation

Conga (CLM)

aaaaaaaaa

Airbase AP Automation

Conga (CLM)

aaaaaaaaa

Airbase AP Automation

Conga (CLM)

aaaaaaaaa

Airbase AP Automation

Conga (CLM)

aaaaaaaaa

Airbase AP Automation

Conga (CLM)

aaaaaaaaa

Airbase AP Automation

Get your software or service in front of the right buyers.

Get your software or service
in front of the right buyers.