Compare Any software

Name: MineralTree AP Automation
Brand: MineralTree
Rating: 2.9 (1 reviews)

Find the perfect software for your team

Add software

Compare up to 3 Products

aaaaaaaaa

asdasdads

2.7(1)

Starting at

$20

sfdaDS

Starting at

Pricing not available

MineralTree AP Automation

MineralTree is a cloud-based accounts payable and payments automation platform designed primarily for mid-market finance teams in North America. The product, now part of Global Payments, digitizes the full invoice-to-pay cycle: invoice capture via email and OCR, coding, multi-level approval routing, two- and three-way PO matching, and integrated B2B payments across ACH, virtual card, wire, and check. A key differentiator is its embedded payments network and SilverPay/virtual card rebate program, which lets customers monetize AP spend while outsourcing payment execution and supplier enablement to MineralTree. The platform offers tight pre-built integrations with mid-market ERPs including NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Microsoft Dynamics, QuickBooks, and Oracle. MineralTree is best suited to US-based mid-market companies looking to reduce manual AP work, gain visibility, and earn rebate income on supplier payments without ripping out their ERP.

2.9(1)

Starting at

Pricing not available

Overall Score & Breakdown

aaaaaaaaa

Capable

46/ 100

0100

0–39 Emerging40–59 Capable60–74 Established75–89 Advanced90–100 Best-in-class

Score breakdown by pillar

Functional Coverage

Market Validation

Buyer Sentiment

Deployment & TCO

Profile Completeness

sfdaDS

Score not available yet

MineralTree AP Automation

Emerging

24/ 100

0100

0–39 Emerging40–59 Capable60–74 Established75–89 Advanced90–100 Best-in-class

Score breakdown by pillar

Buyer Sentiment

Profile Completeness

Pros & Cons

aaaaaaaaa

Top Pros

sdsad

asdasd

Top Cons

asdasd

Advanced procurement features limited

sfdaDS

Top Pros

Top Cons

MineralTree AP Automation

Top Pros

Strong fit for mid-market finance teams with mature ERP integrations

Embedded payments with virtual card rebate revenue share

Outsourced supplier enablement reduces internal effort

Solid NetSuite, Sage Intacct, and Microsoft Dynamics connectors

Combines invoice automation and payments in a single platform

Top Cons

Primarily US-centric — limited international payment and tax coverage

Line-item OCR and complex 3-way matching less mature than enterprise peers

Limited public-sector and global multi-entity capability

Reporting and analytics considered basic by some users

Less suited to large enterprises with complex procurement needs

Company Size Fit

aaaaaaaaa

Startup

Medium

Small Enterprise

High

Mid-Market

Low

Large Enterprise

Medium

sfdaDS

StartupN/A

Small EnterpriseN/A

Mid-MarketN/A

Large EnterpriseN/A

MineralTree AP Automation

Startup

Low

Small Enterprise

Medium

Mid-Market

High

Large Enterprise

Low

Buyer Profile

aaaaaaaaa

Procurement Maturity

L1L2L3L4L5

Best suited for mid-to-large enterprises at Level 3–4 maturity

Industries

ManufacturingHealthcare

asa sdsdsd

Organization Type

Private & Public Companies

sfdaDS

MineralTree AP Automation

Procurement Maturity

L1L2L3L4L5

Best fit for finance-led AP modernization initiatives at organizations with moderate process maturity.

Industries

ManufacturingConstructionReal EstateHospitality & TravelProfessional Services / ConsultingHealthcareNonprofit / NGORetail & eCommerce

Especially strong with US mid-market firms in real estate, hospitality, manufacturing, and professional services.

Organization Type

Private Sector, Mid-Market Enterprises, SMB

Pricing & Deployment

aaaaaaaaa

Pricing Model

Project-based, Retainer, Managed Services Subscription

Free Trial

Yes

Typical Cost Range

Mid-to-high enterprise pricing tier depending on modules, users, and scope - starts from ~$200,000

fhf nvnv

User Tiers

qwqwqw, opoo

Contract Length Options

dsdfsf, kl ooooo

Bundling Options

Modular or full source-to-pay suite bundling available

Deployment Model

2024

Deployment Duration

12–24 weeks (mid-market); 6–12 months (large enterprise global deployments)

sdsds

sfdaDS

Free Trial

MineralTree AP Automation

Pricing Model

Subscription, Transaction-Based, Quote-Based

Free Trial

Typical Cost Range

$15K–$75K/yr

Subscription pricing for mid-market deployments, often partially offset by virtual card rebate revenue share.

User Tiers

Per Named User, Approver, Read-Only, Admin

Contract Length Options

Annual, Multi-Year

Bundling Options

Invoice Automation Only, Payments Only, Full Invoice-to-Pay

Deployment Model

Cloud, SaaS

Deployment Duration

6–10 weeks

Plans

aaaaaaaaa

Starter

$20

per month

✓Approval Time: 7 Days
✓AI Writer Matching

sfdaDS

No plans listed

MineralTree AP Automation

No plans listed

Ratings & Reviews

aaaaaaaaa

2.7out of 5Average

Based on 1 review

View reviews →

Highlights

How effectively does the platform handle invoice capture, OCR/AI extraction, and data validation? 5.0

How well does it support multi-format invoice ingestion (PDF, EDI, XML, email)? 5.0

How easy is it for AP staff to manage exceptions and resolve discrepancies? 4.0

Opportunities

How effectively does the provider transfer market knowledge and negotiation insights to your team? 1.0

How well does the provider support knowledge transfer to build internal analytics capability? 2.0

How clear and actionable are the provider's deliverables and executive presentations? 2.0

sfdaDS

No reviews yet.

MineralTree AP Automation

2.9out of 5Average

Based on 1 review

View reviews →

Highlights

How robust is the automated 2-way/3-way matching and exception routing? 5.0

How effectively does the platform provide real-time visibility into payment status and liabilities? 5.0

How easy is it for AP staff to manage exceptions and resolve discrepancies? 4.0

Opportunities

How much manual intervention has been eliminated from the invoice-to-payment cycle? 2.0

Has it measurably reduced days payable outstanding (DPO) or improved on-time payment rates? 2.0

How much has the platform reduced invoice processing cost per invoice? 2.0

How effectively does the platform handle invoice capture, OCR/AI extraction, and data validation? Best

5.0 / 5

How effectively does the platform handle invoice capture, OCR/AI extraction, and data validation?

—

How effectively does the platform handle invoice capture, OCR/AI extraction, and data validation?

2.0 / 5

How robust is the automated 2-way/3-way matching and exception routing?

2.0 / 5

How robust is the automated 2-way/3-way matching and exception routing?

—

How robust is the automated 2-way/3-way matching and exception routing? Best

5.0 / 5

How well does it support multi-format invoice ingestion (PDF, EDI, XML, email)? Best

5.0 / 5

How well does it support multi-format invoice ingestion (PDF, EDI, XML, email)?

—

How well does it support multi-format invoice ingestion (PDF, EDI, XML, email)?

2.0 / 5

How seamlessly does it integrate with your ERP accounts payable module? Best

3.0 / 5

How seamlessly does it integrate with your ERP accounts payable module?

—

How seamlessly does it integrate with your ERP accounts payable module? Best

3.0 / 5

How effective are the payment scheduling, early payment discount, and dynamic discounting features? Best

3.0 / 5

How effective are the payment scheduling, early payment discount, and dynamic discounting features?

—

How effective are the payment scheduling, early payment discount, and dynamic discounting features?

2.0 / 5

How much has the platform reduced invoice processing cost per invoice? Best

3.0 / 5

How much has the platform reduced invoice processing cost per invoice?

—

How much has the platform reduced invoice processing cost per invoice?

2.0 / 5

Has it measurably reduced days payable outstanding (DPO) or improved on-time payment rates? Best

2.0 / 5

Has it measurably reduced days payable outstanding (DPO) or improved on-time payment rates?

—

Has it measurably reduced days payable outstanding (DPO) or improved on-time payment rates? Best

2.0 / 5

How much manual intervention has been eliminated from the invoice-to-payment cycle? Best

3.0 / 5

How much manual intervention has been eliminated from the invoice-to-payment cycle?

—

How much manual intervention has been eliminated from the invoice-to-payment cycle?

2.0 / 5

How easy is it for AP staff to manage exceptions and resolve discrepancies? Best

4.0 / 5

How easy is it for AP staff to manage exceptions and resolve discrepancies?

—

How easy is it for AP staff to manage exceptions and resolve discrepancies? Best

4.0 / 5

How effectively does the platform provide real-time visibility into payment status and liabilities?

2.0 / 5

How effectively does the platform provide real-time visibility into payment status and liabilities?

—

How effectively does the platform provide real-time visibility into payment status and liabilities? Best

5.0 / 5

How well does it handle multi-entity, multi-currency, and cross-border payment scenarios? Best

4.0 / 5

How well does it handle multi-entity, multi-currency, and cross-border payment scenarios?

—

How well does it handle multi-entity, multi-currency, and cross-border payment scenarios?

3.0 / 5

How effectively does the provider execute strategic sourcing events for complex categories? Best

3.0 / 5

How effectively does the provider execute strategic sourcing events for complex categories?

—

How effectively does the provider execute strategic sourcing events for complex categories?

—

How strong is the provider's category expertise and supplier market intelligence? Best

2.0 / 5

How strong is the provider's category expertise and supplier market intelligence?

—

How strong is the provider's category expertise and supplier market intelligence?

—

How well does the provider manage the end-to-end sourcing process (strategy through award)? Best

3.0 / 5

How well does the provider manage the end-to-end sourcing process (strategy through award)?

—

How well does the provider manage the end-to-end sourcing process (strategy through award)?

—

How effectively does the provider conduct supplier negotiations on your behalf? Best

2.0 / 5

How effectively does the provider conduct supplier negotiations on your behalf?

—

How effectively does the provider conduct supplier negotiations on your behalf?

—

How robust are the provider's analytical tools and should-cost modeling capabilities? Best

2.0 / 5

How robust are the provider's analytical tools and should-cost modeling capabilities?

—

How robust are the provider's analytical tools and should-cost modeling capabilities?

—

Has the provider delivered measurable savings above what your team could achieve internally? Best

2.0 / 5

Has the provider delivered measurable savings above what your team could achieve internally?

—

Has the provider delivered measurable savings above what your team could achieve internally?

—

How effectively has the engagement improved supplier quality, terms, or service levels? Best

3.0 / 5

How effectively has the engagement improved supplier quality, terms, or service levels?

—

How effectively has the engagement improved supplier quality, terms, or service levels?

—

Has the provider helped capture savings in categories you previously considered non-addressable? Best

2.0 / 5

Has the provider helped capture savings in categories you previously considered non-addressable?

—

Has the provider helped capture savings in categories you previously considered non-addressable?

—

How well does the provider collaborate with your internal category managers and stakeholders? Best

3.0 / 5

How well does the provider collaborate with your internal category managers and stakeholders?

—

How well does the provider collaborate with your internal category managers and stakeholders?

—

How effectively does the provider transfer market knowledge and negotiation insights to your team? Best

1.0 / 5

How effectively does the provider transfer market knowledge and negotiation insights to your team?

—

How effectively does the provider transfer market knowledge and negotiation insights to your team?

—

How strong is the quality of the provider's sourcing recommendations and supplier shortlists? Best

3.0 / 5

How strong is the quality of the provider's sourcing recommendations and supplier shortlists?

—

How strong is the quality of the provider's sourcing recommendations and supplier shortlists?

—

How effectively does the platform identify, certify, and track diverse suppliers? Best

4.0 / 5

How effectively does the platform identify, certify, and track diverse suppliers?

—

How effectively does the platform identify, certify, and track diverse suppliers?

—

How well does it support diversity spend tracking and goal-setting by category, region, and tier? Best

2.0 / 5

How well does it support diversity spend tracking and goal-setting by category, region, and tier?

—

How well does it support diversity spend tracking and goal-setting by category, region, and tier?

—

How robust are the diverse supplier discovery and matchmaking capabilities? Best

2.0 / 5

How robust are the diverse supplier discovery and matchmaking capabilities?

—

How robust are the diverse supplier discovery and matchmaking capabilities?

—

How effectively does it handle Tier 2 subcontracting diversity reporting? Best

2.0 / 5

How effectively does it handle Tier 2 subcontracting diversity reporting?

—

How effectively does it handle Tier 2 subcontracting diversity reporting?

—

How well does it integrate with sourcing workflows to embed diversity into sourcing decisions? Best

3.0 / 5

How well does it integrate with sourcing workflows to embed diversity into sourcing decisions?

—

How well does it integrate with sourcing workflows to embed diversity into sourcing decisions?

—

Has the platform helped you measurably increase diverse supplier spend as a percentage of total? Best

2.0 / 5

Has the platform helped you measurably increase diverse supplier spend as a percentage of total?

—

Has the platform helped you measurably increase diverse supplier spend as a percentage of total?

—

How effectively has it supported compliance with regulatory or client diversity requirements? Best

3.0 / 5

How effectively has it supported compliance with regulatory or client diversity requirements?

—

How effectively has it supported compliance with regulatory or client diversity requirements?

—

Has it broadened the pipeline of qualified diverse suppliers for strategic categories? Best

3.0 / 5

Has it broadened the pipeline of qualified diverse suppliers for strategic categories?

—

Has it broadened the pipeline of qualified diverse suppliers for strategic categories?

—

How intuitive is the reporting and stakeholder dashboard for diversity program leaders? Best

2.0 / 5

How intuitive is the reporting and stakeholder dashboard for diversity program leaders?

—

How intuitive is the reporting and stakeholder dashboard for diversity program leaders?

—

How easy is it for diverse suppliers to self-register and maintain their certifications? Best

3.0 / 5

How easy is it for diverse suppliers to self-register and maintain their certifications?

—

How easy is it for diverse suppliers to self-register and maintain their certifications?

—

How effectively does the platform support storytelling and ROI reporting for diversity programs? Best

3.0 / 5

How effectively does the platform support storytelling and ROI reporting for diversity programs?

—

How effectively does the platform support storytelling and ROI reporting for diversity programs?

—

How effectively does the provider classify and enrich your spend data? Best

3.0 / 5

How effectively does the provider classify and enrich your spend data?

—

How effectively does the provider classify and enrich your spend data?

—

How robust is the provider's analytics methodology and industry benchmarking data? Best

2.0 / 5

How robust is the provider's analytics methodology and industry benchmarking data?

—

How robust is the provider's analytics methodology and industry benchmarking data?

—

How well does the provider identify actionable savings opportunities beyond surface-level findings? Best

3.0 / 5

How well does the provider identify actionable savings opportunities beyond surface-level findings?

—

How well does the provider identify actionable savings opportunities beyond surface-level findings?

—

How effectively does the provider handle data integration across multiple source systems? Best

3.0 / 5

How effectively does the provider handle data integration across multiple source systems?

—

How effectively does the provider handle data integration across multiple source systems?

—

How strong is the provider's capability to deliver predictive and prescriptive analytics? Best

3.0 / 5

How strong is the provider's capability to deliver predictive and prescriptive analytics?

—

How strong is the provider's capability to deliver predictive and prescriptive analytics?

—

Has the provider's analysis led to measurable realized savings or cost avoidance? Best

2.0 / 5

Has the provider's analysis led to measurable realized savings or cost avoidance?

—

Has the provider's analysis led to measurable realized savings or cost avoidance?

—

How effectively has the service improved spend visibility and addressable spend coverage? Best

2.0 / 5

How effectively has the service improved spend visibility and addressable spend coverage?

—

How effectively has the service improved spend visibility and addressable spend coverage?

—

Has the service supported better category strategy decisions with data-backed insights? Best

2.0 / 5

Has the service supported better category strategy decisions with data-backed insights?

—

Has the service supported better category strategy decisions with data-backed insights?

—

How clear and actionable are the provider's deliverables and executive presentations? Best

2.0 / 5

How clear and actionable are the provider's deliverables and executive presentations?

—

How clear and actionable are the provider's deliverables and executive presentations?

—

How well does the provider support knowledge transfer to build internal analytics capability? Best

2.0 / 5

How well does the provider support knowledge transfer to build internal analytics capability?

—

How well does the provider support knowledge transfer to build internal analytics capability?

—

How effectively does the provider refresh and maintain spend analytics on an ongoing basis? Best

3.0 / 5

How effectively does the provider refresh and maintain spend analytics on an ongoing basis?

—

How effectively does the provider refresh and maintain spend analytics on an ongoing basis?

—

Integration & Compatibility

aaaaaaaaa

Typical Integration Time

Integration Cost Range

Prebuilt Connectors

Prebuilt connectors available

ERP Compatibility

ERP Compatibility (SAP, Oracle, Dynamics)

Third-Party API Support

Third-party & API Support

Supplier Network Integration

sfdaDS

No integration data available

MineralTree AP Automation

Typical Integration Time

2–6 weeks for pre-built ERP connectors (NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Dynamics, QuickBooks).

Integration Cost Range

Included

Prebuilt Connectors

NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Microsoft Dynamics GP, Dynamics 365 Business Central, QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Desktop, Sage 300, Sage 100, Blackbaud

ERP Compatibility

NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Microsoft Dynamics GP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Desktop, Sage 300, Sage 100, Oracle, Blackbaud

Third-Party API Support

REST APIs, Webhooks, ERP integrations, Banking integrations

Supplier Network Integration

MineralTree SilverPay, Virtual Card Network, ACH Network

Global & Regional

aaaaaaaaa

Languages & Local Support

FrenchGermanSpanish

Data Residency & Compliance

sesadasdaEUUKAustralia

Regulatory & Tax Compliance

sdasdPEPPOL Network ComplianceSales Tax Compliance (US)VAT Compliance (EUUK)VAT Compliance (EUUK)

Public Sector Availability

varies by country

sfdaDS

No regional data available

MineralTree AP Automation

Regions Served

North America

Languages & Local Support

English

Data Residency & Compliance

SOC 1SOC 2

Regulatory & Tax Compliance

US sales tax1099 reporting

Public Sector Availability

Limited

Differentiators

aaaaaaaaa

AI & Touchless Processing Capability

kbjkbjkb

Invoice Capture Intelligence

kbklbklb

Workflow Flexibility

klbklbklb

ERP Integration Depth

klbklbklbklb

Supplier Experience & Portal

klbklbklbkl

Global Compliance & Tax Support

bklbkbklb

Exception Handling Capability

lbklbklb

Analytics & AP Insights

blbklbk

Scalability & Performance

bklblbklbk

Autonomous AP / AI Agent Readiness

bkb

sfdaDS

—

MineralTree AP Automation

—

Company & Market

aaaaaaaaa

Customer Base

Global enterprises including Fortune 500 companies across industries, large plasy into mid-market and public enterprise as well

Revenue Band

lklklk kmm upppppp

Awards & Recognition

Awards and Recognition

sfdaDS

—

MineralTree AP Automation

Customer Base

Thousands of mid-market customers across the US, with concentration in real estate, hospitality, manufacturing, healthcare, nonprofit, and professional services.

aaaaaaaaa

sfdaDS

No tags

MineralTree AP Automation

AP AutomationInvoice ProcessingB2B PaymentsPayment AutomationVirtual Card PaymentsInvoice CapturePO MatchingSupplier Enablement

Compare Any software

aaaaaaaaa

sfdaDS

MineralTree AP Automation

aaaaaaaaa

sfdaDS

MineralTree AP Automation

aaaaaaaaa

sfdaDS

MineralTree AP Automation

aaaaaaaaa

sfdaDS

MineralTree AP Automation

aaaaaaaaa

sfdaDS

MineralTree AP Automation

aaaaaaaaa

sfdaDS

MineralTree AP Automation

aaaaaaaaa

sfdaDS

MineralTree AP Automation

aaaaaaaaa

sfdaDS

MineralTree AP Automation

aaaaaaaaa

sfdaDS

MineralTree AP Automation

aaaaaaaaa

sfdaDS

MineralTree AP Automation

aaaaaaaaa

sfdaDS

MineralTree AP Automation

aaaaaaaaa

sfdaDS

MineralTree AP Automation

aaaaaaaaa

sfdaDS

MineralTree AP Automation

aaaaaaaaa

sfdaDS

MineralTree AP Automation

Get your software or service in front of the right buyers.

Get your software or service
in front of the right buyers.